If happened to me, it could have happened to any average person residing in your state.
Of what do I speak? The State of Delaware operates hand in hand with those who devise and make false allegations for reasons of custody, divorce, or just plain sociopathic maliciousness.
The lawyers, legislators and law enforcement in your state could care less. Its all about politics, federal funding and career enhancement.
The State, through its various agencies, rewards and enables the actual perpetrators. It is nothing less than state sponsored racketeering, under the guise of "protection." They are indeed creating victims for federal funding.
My ex wife (the perpetrator) was arrested September 1, 2012, and charged with multiple counts of filing fabricated police reports. In the last of these, she faked an "attack" on herself, with the intent of framing me for it. She accepted a plea deal offered by the State.
Scot Husbands - former Delaware educator was acquitted of child molestation. This acquittal occurred even though the Delaware Department of Justice threw everything they could to try to ignore and wit hold exculpatory evidence in their attempt to convict an innocent man.
You would think they would learn from cases such as these, and attempt to correct their ways. Not so. In fact , to the contrary, what they actually do is try new ways to circle the wagons in attempt to insulate and protect this maligned system.
Joe Faulkner was in bed asleep when his ex girlfriend allegedly received a FB message from a newly created photo-less (of course) profile, with Joe's name attached to it. In this message, the person (implication Joe) was issuing threats on the life of the ex girlfriend.
She would report this to the Delaware State Police. The next day, a warrant would be issued for Joe's arrest. This would occur without any investigation, by the way. Of course, it is possible to acquire the exact location from which the FB account and message originated.. The DOJ knows this. All that is required from FB is a subpoena from a government agency (Delaware DOJ) to acquire the exact IP address of the FB account and message. This could have either exonerated or implicated Joe in the alleged FB terroristic threatening allegation.
Joe's repeated requests were - of course - denied, citing "out of scope".
The DAG would eventually drop the charges against Joe, but with no resolution as to who sent the fabricated FB message, in an attempt to frame him for terroristic threatening.
I'm sure--as is the pattern--the perpetrator of the fraudulent terroristic note will continue in their attempts, feeling now more emboldened to continue with no fear of scrutiny.
Again, the DOJ refused to issue the subpoena that could, in all probability, clear up in its entirety as to who sent it.
Who knows? Maybe they did acquire this information from FB, but the identity of the person just didn't fit the pre-conceived narrative they were after.
Of course all of this is business as usual, unless it happens to you.
The DV Cartel continues its trade.
Gordon Smith
No comments:
Post a Comment